Re: pen vs ldirector

From: Ulric Eriksson <ulric_at_siag.nu>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:37:11 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Mark Jayson R. Alvarez wrote:

> PS=Parent Squid Proxy
> CS= Child Squid Proxy
> <->= CARP
> u=users
> _____________
> / \
> ( INTERNET )
> \_____________/
> |
> |
> _____ ____ ____
> PS1 PS2 PS3 ----->all three including
> ------- ----- ------ the 2 pen are located at
> \ | / our noc
> \ | /
> \ | /
> {PEN1} <-> {PEN2} -
> \ /
> \ --------------- /
> |___________/
> / / \ \
> / / \ \
> ------- ------ ------ ------
> CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 ------> Child proxies are
> ------ ------ ------ ------- distributed to
> / / \ \ various clients(
> u u u u u u u u u u u u u univs, govt agen-
> u u u u u u u u u u u u u u cies, etc)

Why don't you just do this on cs1-cs4:

cache_peer ps1 parent 3128 3130
cache_peer ps2 parent 3128 3130
cache_peer ps3 parent 3128 3130

It feels like the functionality you're trying to get from pen is
already built into squid.

Ulric
Received on Tue Nov 22 2005 - 11:37:13 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 22 2005 - 11:37:14 CET